 | | Re: Forestmen and Wolfpack... thoughts
|
|
(...) Ahh, Celts! Now it makes sense (light bulb above head) All these years I thought they were making fun of Scots, but instead they were just doing a bad portrayal of Celts. Thanks for the clarification. -Chris (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Forestmen and Wolfpack... thoughts
|
|
(...) I guess I wasn't the only one who used the bulls as Mercenary Guild/Camp. My evil prince hires them as a group to help him win the war. I guess I had better explain a little of my story board. I noticed that the new 2000 knights have a very (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Forestmen and Wolfpack... thoughts
|
|
(...) If memory serves me right, those were supposed to be Celts. I was not very happy with their portrayal. Tony (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Forestmen and Wolfpack... thoughts
|
|
(...) They're called "Kilts." They're hired thugs from the North (like Vikings, or possibly Highlanders?) I also could care less for Costner, but RH: PofT is one of my favorite movies of all time! -Chris (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Forestmen and Wolfpack... thoughts
|
|
Shiri Dori wrote in message ... (...) I like that: "(1)" format... I think I'll borrow it <g> <snip Thoughts> Here is how I've come to think of the three aforementioned legovillians: First of all, have you seen Robin Hood Prince of Theves (1)? Well (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
