Subject:
|
Re: Deserted Temple
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Jul 2007 23:24:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
12134 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
> I don't see this as a deserted temple... it is
> in immaculate condition
To be fair, he did say "deserted" (lacking people)... not "abandoned", or
"ruined". The local religous population is probably just sleeping off last
nights festivities, and won't the knight be surprised when they wake up and
surround him ;-).
--
Brian Davis
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Deserted Temple
|
| (...) I don't see this as a deserted temple. Altho it is sparsely populated, it is in immaculate condition - the arches are still in place and there is little decay. Temples are usually made with choice materials, and locals sometimes swipe the (...) (17 years ago, 2-Jul-07, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
