Subject:
|
Re: Announcing the MOCC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Jun 2004 04:33:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4387 times
|
| |
|
|
Craig,
In lugnet.castle, Craig Hicks wrote:
| |
Hi Magnus,
Would you consider relaxing the height limit a bit, to allow for some style
variation (say, a cliffside fortification and
narrow
multi-story or ruined structures), by allowing castles in the competition to
be up to 1.5 or 2 times higher than they are long?
Craig
|
Thanks for showing interest in the competition!
You mean like say building a castle which is 24 by 32 pegs, but twice as high as
it is long? So 64 pegs in height, whatever that translates to in brick?
I’m definitely open to the idea, but have asked some of the other BrikFest 2004
coordinators, what they think, and we haven’t quite finished discussing this
yet. The decision is ultimatley mine to make, but I’m interested to hear various
opinions.
So if anyone here has any opinions for or against I’d be happy to hear from them
(ASAP)either by private email or here.
Thanks
Magnus
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Updated rules for the MOCC
|
| Hello all, In view of the request that the size and height limits for the MOCC be relaxed somewhat, I have decided to change the rules to make for a more flexible building challenge. First though, Craig, that pic you had a link to basically looked (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jun-04, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Announcing the MOCC
|
| (...) Hi Magnus, Would you consider relaxing the height limit a bit, to allow for some style variation (say, a cliffside fortification and (URL) narrow multi-story or ruined structures>), by allowing castles in the competition to be up to 1.5 or 2 (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}