| | Re: castle vs. space (was: Re: AFOLs - The comic!)
|
| (...) Um, technically (and, correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't worked with such people as Carl Sagan or Issac Asimov ;-) space doesn't actually suck; it's the air (pressurised) that, um, blows. Peace and astrophysics, Professor whateverly (21 years ago, 29-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.space)
| | | | Re: castle vs. space (was: Re: AFOLs - The comic!)
|
| (...) You are quite correct Ley, well more or less anyways. And I should know, I was a member of the Space and Plasma Physics research group at UMD for two years. .... ah space plasma how miss you.... Um, er, anyways, good show Ley! -Dan Rubin (21 years ago, 29-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.space)
| | | | Re: castle vs. space (was: Re: AFOLs - The comic!)
|
| (...) Which leaves us to the interesting proposition that we only live not because we suck air in, but blow it out! Keep talking or die! :-) -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 29-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.space)
| | | | Re: castle vs. space (was: Re: AFOLs - The comic!)
|
| (...) Indeed! We carbon dioxide generators (1) must publish or perish. I post therefore I am. Peace and philosophy, Professor Whateverly (1) We're only here because the plants need us. (21 years ago, 29-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.space)
| | | | Re: castle vs. space (was: Re: AFOLs - The comic!)
|
| (...) By the scientific definition, that's technically true, just like pushing a stalled car along level ground isn't technically "work". If you've ever pushed a car, you've probably been impressed by how much effort it takes to not do any work. In (...) (21 years ago, 29-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.space)
| |