|
| | Re: Compatible?
|
| (...) The smaller parts (bricks & accessories) are compatible (Purists may not like them on Purity grounds), but the hulls themselves almost certainly will not be. You're right about the rocks-at-sea and historical-compatibility issues, though! (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle)
| | | | Re: Compatible?
|
| Those heavily armored knights would sink like rocks out at sea. I'm not sure if the parts are compatible, but I'm sure it's not historically compatible. ;) -Aaron "Richard Noeckel" <shroud_of_kung_fu@hotmail.com> wrote in message (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle)
| | | | Re: The Ice Temple...
|
| (...) Great Pics! (...) Thanks... I'll take that as a compliment : ) (...) God Bless You, Nathan (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | Re: The Ice Temple...
|
| (...) Hi, (...) Perhaps... (...) Thanks! (...) I knew someone would come up with an explanation... A man after my own heart but with more time on the net : ) . Thanks and God Bless You, Nathan (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | Re: The Ice Temple...
|
| (...) Hi Josh, Glad you liked it! The skeleton is part of the mystery because: 1) The skull piece on a regular fig couldn't be seen from the angle I wanted. 2) I was to busy to cut shreds of cloth to go on the skeleton. 3) And...It just looks (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle)
| |