To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 15893
  Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
 
Hello! (...) I do not agree at all :-) (...) In these years there were no "Good" and "Bad", there were just knights from different clans, who sometimes made war on each other, sometimes lived in peace together. BTW the Crusaders are more aggressive (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)
 
  Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
 
Hi again (...) You can look at it that way too I guess (...) Don't agree. I mean it's true that Crusaders had more battle machines, but they more in everything. Black Falcons had only 6 LEGO sets while the Crusaders had like 14. They had more in (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)
 
  Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
 
Hello! [Crusaders vs. Black Falcons] (...) That's true. And this is why I always preferred Black Falcons rather than Crusaders. BFs were the underdogs that I've sympathy for. (...) Hehe, I can understand this point of view. Crusaders look noble with (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR