Subject:
|
Re: Factions (and violence)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Fri, 27 Jul 2001 15:16:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1801 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Leonard Hoffman writes:
> > > LEGO was proud of having never produced sets that glorify war and violence.
> > > They never produced (and I guess they won't ever produce) "Kriegsspielzeug"
> > > like WWI or WWII tanks, bombers and so on.
In case it hasn't been thrown out, how would the Sopwith Camel play into the
Lego non-implicit violence scheme?
Jason
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Factions (and violence)
|
| (...) Especially since it has a pair of machine guns on it. Give it another 25 years or so to remove the last generations with direct contact to WW2, and I won't be surprised to see a Model Team Tiger tank. As far as "war toys" go, I'm surprised we (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jul-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Factions (and violence)
|
| (...) Krieg: war. Spiel: game. Zeug: well, hazy on that one. "Stuff"? Of course, I use the castle and pirates stuff for games.... Bruce (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
120 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
