|
|
 | | Re: Knights' Kingdom™ is ugly.
|
| (...) David, I disagree completely with you here. Playmobil may not be able to make actual construction toys, but one thing they can do, is make VERY nice and real looking castles. The new Lego Knights Kingdom sets neither look nice, nor resembles (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.castle, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Sheik's Oasis
|
| (...) I think you find more people think its Arwen (or Legolas if they like Bashki) ;) Pity, I always liked Glorfindel. Especially as he appears to have been killed in the first age, then came back mid 2nd or 3rd age (depending on what you read), it (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom™ is ugly.
|
| (...) I have to agree with you Felix. LEGO is my #1 hobby, but my #2 is medieval stuff (weapons mostly). I have many books with photos of real castles, so I can recognize a good/accurate castle model done in LEGO. The 2004 castle sets resemble (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.castle, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Knights’ Kingdom™ is ugly.
|
| (...) Actually...I thought the 8778 was one of the better sets that came out... :) Benjamin Medinets PS... want to see ugly, see the Grand Tournament set. (21 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.castle, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Knights’ Kingdom™ is ugly.
|
| (...) I have to disagree on this one point, at least for the set that I bought. I just purchased the Castle of Morcia (8781) a few days ago. It *looks* great (if you ignore the rainbow knights and rainbow weapons). There are also some pretty cool (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
|
