To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / *20807 (-10)
  Re: Return of the King sneak preview
 
(...) Using Dobby's head for Gollum is ironic in light of Gollum's attitude toward Dobby. Gollum had no kind words for the house elf in his "acceptance speech" at the MTV awards. (21 years ago, 16-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle)
 
  Re: banner year for castle
 
(...) In set 8777, is it really Tan classic sword? It looks Gold to me or more like the color of the C3PO color. (URL) (21 years ago, 16-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
 
  Re: banner year for castle
 
(...) I'm one of the many AFOLs who primarily collect rather than build. As such, I am unlikely to spend a cent on these crappy models (no offense to anyone, just my own view). Which is not altogether a bad thing, as it will leave me more to spend (...) (21 years ago, 16-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle)
 
  Re: banner year for castle
 
(...) Say what you want. If I was ten, I would be drooling over those sets. I almost drooling now. Yes, few bricks . . . and less than the MOC standards many people hold themselves to but I can picture many a child have more fun than most AFOLs with (...) (21 years ago, 16-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle)
 
  Re: banner year for castle
 
(...) Uh... I think that might be a violet knight in 8777. The one in 8780 definately appears to be violet compared to the blue in the structure. There is a light blue knight in 8779 so it would make more sense (from a color contrast standpoint) (...) (21 years ago, 16-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
 
  Re: CASTLE ALIVE (Re: banner year for castle)
 
(...) Unfortunately, it's the legacy of Jack Stone: (URL) I think the reason for all the juniorized parts is that it could be cheaper to produce and handle, say, one 1x2x5 than five 1x2s. Or, one BURP rock vs. the equivalent several dozen bricks. (...) (21 years ago, 16-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
 
  Re: banner year for castle
 
(...) No, it's more like, "Who approaches the bridge of death must answer me these questions three, ere the other side ye see!" But seriously, I agree with the others, this is a great year for castle! Maybe not the best sets, but still great!! My (...) (21 years ago, 16-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle)
 
  Re: banner year for castle
 
(...) I too was eagerly awaiting the new batch of Lego Castle sets. I must say I really am dissapointed in the general design (very junior!) and the colors of the weapons (gold & red blades - what the...?!)... I was certainly the last one to start (...) (21 years ago, 16-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle)
 
  RE: banner year for castle
 
-----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of Larry Pieniazek Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:25 AM To: lugnet.castle@lugnet.com Subject: Re: banner year for castle (...) Fortunately fantasy (...) (21 years ago, 16-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle)
 
  Re: CASTLE ALIVE (Re: banner year for castle)
 
In lugnet.castle, Yaron Dori wrote: SNIPPED (...) Yes, it is good to see some non-HP Castle sets in the works. It's annoying to have to wait till Summer to see them but eh..it's not so far off. :) (...) C'mon now... I think that's a little harsh. ;) (...) (21 years ago, 16-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle, FTX)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR