 | | Re: L3P and part no 30359 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) Can you post a picture somewhere, showing what you mean? Steve (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: L3P and part no 30359 —George Manousakis
|
| | | | (...) I posted two pictures with part no 30359 at: (URL) part is ok in Ldraw but as you will see when you convert it to pov with L3P the base is not scaled correctly. I guess it has something to do with the L3P conversion. George (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: L3P and part no 30359 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) Wow. That's bizarre. Steve (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: L3P and part no 30359 —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | GeoMan <geoman@ars.net.gr> wrote in message news:FtB03J.35v@lugnet.com... (...) L3P seems to have a problem with the 1-4con3.dat primitive. The missing outer conic area uses the primitive, while the inner conic area was inlined and so shows up (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
