| |
Thanks. The links have been fixed. The 800x600 render was the original
version. It's been replaced now.
I did use the radiosity feature. Great as it is, radiosity will kill
rendering time. The 1024x768 took 12 hr. 15 min 8 sec. Probably would
have taken half that without the anti-aliasing. However, I think the
results of using radiosity are worth the extra time.
Travis Dickinson
Jack Hawk wrote:
> Travis,
>
> Nice! I really like the individual renders of the
> Tie-Pod. I had to poke around to get the link to work
> right from the Wallpapers page though. Did you use the
> POV radiosity feature? My jaw drops each time I see
> renders using it; some day I'll learn to use it
> myself.
>
> I do have one other little nit to pick though: is the
> 800x600 render supposed to be different? I actually
> like the others better. :)
>
> Keep up the good work.
>
> --Jack
> AFOL, St. Louis
>
> --- Travis Dickinson <sivar@sc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
> > Go to the "Wallpaper" section. Opinions welcome.
> >
> > Travis Dickinson
> > http://home.sc.rr.com/sivar/
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com
>
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Star Wars related wallpaper
|
| Travis, Nice! I really like the individual renders of the Tie-Pod. I had to poke around to get the link to work right from the Wallpapers page though. Did you use the POV radiosity feature? My jaw drops each time I see renders using it; some day (...) (22 years ago, 19-Nov-02, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.starwars)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
