|
|
 | | Re: '59 Caddy Hovercar Raytraces
|
| (...) Wow, a blast from the Future that Never Was. Very cool. Where's the robot Elvis, though? Oh, and how do you get your models to float? <grins, ducks and runs> ++Lar (24 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, lugnet.town, lugnet.cad.ray)
| | | | | Re: '59 Caddy Hovercar Raytraces
|
| (...) front down to the huge trunk. Now, where can get that many pink bricks? ;-) Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, lugnet.town, lugnet.cad.ray)
| | | | | '59 Caddy Hovercar Raytraces
|
| Here are some pics of my hovercar: (URL) LMKWYT! --Bram (24 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, lugnet.town, lugnet.cad.ray)
| | | | | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
| (...) I think this is a little too much for the task, you don't need to try to remove the interior too, it won't make a big difference. Think of a 2x2 plate, if you can remove the stud4, you're saving 48 quads, 64 lines and 32 optional lines while (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
| (...) In this case you could leave out the interior of the 2x2, but you must use the entire top of the 4x4. In the case of solid wall like structures, however, it could reduce 90% of the blocks to no interiour, and no studs. -Chuck (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
| Tore Eriksson wrote... (...) Uh, maybe. However, if you have a 2x2 brick on top of the 2x4, how do you leave out only half the TOP section? Or you wouldn't? Maybe parts should be broken into subparts for analysis? I think the main problem is, that (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
| John VanZwieten wrote... (...) A general analyzer may be a good idea. As you say, the optimized .dat file can be viewed in any rendering engine, and also, you can run L3P on it. Of course, the analyzer could be compiled into L3P, L3Lab, LDLite etc. (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
| Leonardo Zide wrote... (...) I assume you have manually added extra info to all parts into your pieces.bin. Is there any chance you could export that info into some META commands to be inserted into each part in the LDraw PARTS base, so LDraw (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
| (...) It does take some extra time to load a big file but the speed increase later is well worth it. After doing the initial calculations, you only need to check the studs for the bricks you move so it's very fast. Leonardo (24 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
| Leonardo: (...) So in "every" part you have put a "stud-slot-point" in all the places where a stud from another part can connect with this part. So if a stud on a non-transparent part is at the stud-slot of another non-transparent part, it is (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
