 | | Re: On obscure color conversions.
|
|
(...) The (...) Jeff, I'm glad you picked up on that. But we're not the company who printed "transparent" in catalogs that are arguably older than both of us. :) James J. (25 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: On obscure color conversions.
|
|
(...) of (...) show (...) Thanks for mentioning the LDraw FAQ. At the bottom of my own LDraw page (URL), I've clipped the chapters involving colors and inserted a few of my own color alternatives which should work on either LDraw, MLCad, or POV-Ray. (...) (25 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: On obscure color conversions.
|
|
(...) Okay, I'll concede to that... but I'm still calling it translucent ;) J (25 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: On obscure color conversions.
|
|
(...) That's not the way I learned the difference between transparent and translucent. So, I dug out my mini dictionary and looked 'em up: Transparent: "Capable of transmitting light so that objects and images beyond can be clearly perceived." (...) (25 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: On obscure color conversions.
|
|
(...) As long as we're taking the time to be official, we should also be correct. The "Trans" color names shouldn't be short for "Transparent" because transparent means a lack of color. The "Trans" should be short for "Translucent" which means (...) (25 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
