 | | Re: tubing [DAT]
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Larry Pieniazek writes: Ok, for anyone that wants to give this a whirl... I've attached a sample MPD. It has tubing the length I expect... 14 plates high. It renders fine in MLCad and in L3Lab (using the versions I posted (...) (26 years ago, 30-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: part skins (was Re: some thoughts on ldraw parts)
|
|
(...) Two small problems... 1. you have to create the graphic. For a complex torso this is hard. 2D helps but there still are a lot of triangles. Hence my suggestion for an authoring tool to help with this task. (if MLCad could allow display a (...) (26 years ago, 30-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: part skins (was Re: some thoughts on ldraw parts)
|
|
I'm surprised that this hasn't been mentioned yet, but 'skins' wouldn't be very hard to implement at all...in fact it HAS been done (although not in this context *). Simply make a two-dimensional part for each graphic and create a Graphic or Decal (...) (26 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: part skins (was Re: some thoughts on ldraw parts)
|
|
(...) <snip> I feel this suggestion as worded combines two different, separable ideas, both of which merit discussion. One would be the introduction of subcategories for decorated versions of parts within the authoring tools. The other is a new, (...) (26 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part skins (was Re: some thoughts on ldraw parts)
|
|
(...) :) That sounds like a good prayer/meditation to/for me. (...) I'd like to also apologize. My responses (to both Adams) were somewhat overdone. Good thing I toned them down before posting them, eh? (...) For me, it wasn't your chosen example -- (...) (26 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
