Subject:
|
Re: LDD to replace LDRAW?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.ldd
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:52:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
24991 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.cad.ldd, Timothy Gould wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.ldd, Eduardo Vazquez Harte wrote:
> > Hello I'm wondering is LDD to replace Ldraw ?
> >
> > I hope not, so far I don't like LDD
> >
> > Another question I seen the airport of 1994 in lego shop at home and I'm
> > wondering does LEGO company use our tools to make their pictures?
> >
> > I mean do they use ldraw and pov-ray?
> >
> > I hope LDRAW never becomes replaced for a program make by a company free or not.
>
> I very much doubt LDraw is going away any time soon. For one thing it has many,
> many more parts than LDD including a number that will probably never appear in
> LDD due to being outdates. Also the interfacing to povray and other programs
> will help ensure great longevity. And that's ignoring the fact that the LDraw
> editors are significantly more powerful than LDD. My conclusion is that the
> LDraw system is here to stay.
>
> I don't think Lego use LDraw and POVray. They have their own internal CAD system
> and will use more expensive and user-friendly renderers. For a good example of
> this look at the Batman sets.
>
> Tim
>
> PS. This email is my opinion and not that of the Steering Comittee.
Nice to read that ldraw will continue, I knew that, I don't believe LDD is
better and as you said ldraw has old LEGO parts :D nice 80s and early 90s,
about LEGO's cad wonder what they use anyways I believe our stuff is better.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDD to replace LDRAW?
|
| (...) I very much doubt LDraw is going away any time soon. For one thing it has many, many more parts than LDD including a number that will probably never appear in LDD due to being outdates. Also the interfacing to povray and other programs will (...) (18 years ago, 28-Jun-06, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|