 | | Re: 10183 postponed?
|
|
(...) :: snip :: (...) I share Jason's sentiment - I wish they would have kept compatibility with all but the most recent versions of Windows. I guess the software people decided that was the best thing to do. But it does pose an inconvenience for (...) (17 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 postponed?
|
|
(...) On the plus side, it does seem to run on older hardware. I could only run 1.6 on my wife's laptop which she bought last year. Last night, I was able to install and run 2.0 on my 5+ year old machine. -Elroy (17 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 postponed?
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, LDD 2.0 no longer runs on earlier versions of Windows. LDD 1.6 ran quite happily under Windows 2000, but the new version crashes as soon as you place a brick. It's also a bit mean to write off all the previously uploaded models. (...) (17 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: What's new in LDD 2.0?
|
|
(...) So far I think that may be the only thing. I only see 8-10 % CPU. So much for wishing they would have improved LDD with all the recommendations they got. Back to Ldraw again for me. (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| |
| | Re: What's new in LDD 2.0?
|
|
(...) It is significantly faster and less of a hog. Apparently some people are running into graphic card problems but it's a huge, huge, huge improvement of 1.6. Featurewise 2.0 has a lot of cute things like right-click view rotation and other (...) (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
