To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 874
873  |  875
Subject: 
Re: LDraw not to sell CD-ROM at Kidvention in July & Misc CD-ROM issues
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Mon, 12 Jun 2000 19:13:34 GMT
Viewed: 
1620 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw Fredrik Glöckner
<fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote:

tim@zacktron.com (Tim Courtney) writes:

Jonathan - [...]  I just noticed a few of the one liner questions
which have caused so many problems in the past.  I'm encouraging
you to stick with using a signature to sign your messages [...]

Tim, I have to disagree with you again.  If there is something which
is more annoying than a person posting a one-line-reply, it is a
person posting a one-line-reply _and_ five automatically inserted
signature lines.

I see your point.  It does depend on if the one-liner is an
intelligent statement/question or if its ill-phrased and adds little
value.

I have never heard any rules of netiquette which suggest that one
_should_ use a signature.  In stead, standard netiquette typically say
that a signature should be as short as possible.  A typical rule of
thumb is that a signature should be no longer than four lines.
Further, there should be a signature separator between the body of the
message (what you type in manually) and the signature.  The signature
separator is "-- " (with newline on either side).

Perhaps what I meant and should have said would be more along the
lines of having the person sign their name instead.

The other part of your message I agree with, though.  It does
typically make it easier for people reading a thread if you quote just
so much text to make the context clear.  It can sometimes be a bit
difficult to decide just how much quoted text to include.  Personally,
I lean towards quoting as little as possible, as it is very easy with
some client software to retrieve the parent article of the one you are
reading.

Yes.

Always quoting all the text of the parent article is a sure fire way
to annoy people in the long run, and should mostly be avoided.

I'd agree.  I like to intersperse my comments between quoted text, and
kill the irrelevant stuff.  Sometimes depending on the length of the
message and all, I'll write a reply before a full quote, but not very
often.

-Tim

http://www.zacktron.com
http://www.ldraw.org
AIM:   timcourtne
ICQ:   23951114



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LDraw not to sell CD-ROM at Kidvention in July & Misc CD-ROM issues
 
(...) Personally, I have never been offended by anyone not typing in their name below the article. After all, the contents of the article is what is important, and the relevant information about the author is (normally) in the headers anyway. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LDraw not to sell CD-ROM at Kidvention in July & Misc CD-ROM issues
 
(...) Tim, I have to disagree with you again. If there is something which is more annoying than a person posting a one-line-reply, it is a person posting a one-line-reply _and_ five automatically inserted signature lines. I have never heard any (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

9 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR