 | | Re: Why quads? Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch —Travis Cobbs
| | | | (...) Actually, no. That is indeed a long-term goal, but it is hampered by two things. First of all, it's a lot of work. Secondly, the current algorithm is actually useful to part authors, since it can visually highlight missing conditional lines. (...) (14 years ago, 23-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Why quads? Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 4th batch —Don Heyse
| | | | | (...) Hmmm, it seems to me that any algorithm that can find the missing Type 5 lines (in order to create the dummy entries) should be able to find *all* of the Type 5 lines. Some missing lines is just a special case of all missing. So just include (...) (14 years ago, 23-Sep-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | |
