| |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Jim DeVona wrote:
> So, because I am a geek, and because I was curious about the practical reasons
> for the DOS line ending requirement, I conducted a relatively comprehensive
> compatibility inventory.
>
> http://anoved.net/2010/01/ldraw-line-endings/
Sweet! It's pretty cool just to see the list of screenshots. Thanks for
putting that together, it was a neat read.
> My conclusion is essentially that this is as it should be - we have a format
> that preserves compatibility with older components, and tools that are robust
> enough to understand reasonable exceptions to the format.
Exactly.
> Also, wow - as I started collecting screenshots and trying out less familiar
> programs, it became evident just how much interesting LDraw software there is. I
> think this is great news for the community, and something for the developers
> (and the Jessimans) to be proud of.
:)
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Issue with new LDConfig.ldr
|
| (...) for the DOS line ending requirement, I conducted a relatively comprehensive compatibility inventory. (URL) nearly twenty programs tested (see the post for repetitive screenshots), only James J's LDRAW and LEDIT (and perhaps LDAO, although I (...) (15 years ago, 8-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
