Subject:
|
Re: Contributer Agreement v2
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:01:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3143 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Peter Howkins wrote:
> Orion Pobursky wrote:
> >
> > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Peter Howkins wrote:
> >
> > > An attempt at some language for a 'base level of rights' as suggested
> > > by Jacob Sparre Anderson and Dan Boger.
> > >
> > > "Any future EndUser license proposed by ldraw.org will grant at least
> > > these rights to EndUsers.
> > >
> > > 1) The EndUser has the right to modify licensed work and base
> > > new works on it.
> > > 2) The EndUser has the right to distribute work covered by the
> > > license to other people.
> > > 3) The EndUser is allowed to submit derived work back to ldraw.org
> > > under the terms of the Contributor agreement."
> >
> > Isn't 3 redundant and cover by the 1?
>
>
> Yes, you're right, a combo of 1 & 2 should cover 3.
> When I was trimming so much out of your license
> I should have been more careful in adding bits :)
>
> Can anyone think of anything that ought to be in
> 'Base Level' of rights ?
I'd like a no-cost restriction. In other words, anything covered can be
distributed for free. This doesn't mean you can't charge, it just means that
you don't have to charge. Or maybe all this is implied by the above? Do we
need to explicitly state this?
-Orion
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Contributer Agreement v2
|
| (...) Yes, you're right, a combo of 1 & 2 should cover 3. When I was trimming so much out of your license I should have been more careful in adding bits :) Can anyone think of anything that ought to be in 'Base Level' of rights ? Peter (20 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
