 | | Re: mailing list linkage — Todd Lehman
| | | | (...) Cool. Hmm, which to choose... It makes less work for me doing it the mailing list way, because of the incoming gateway translations at the e-mail level. What do we want to call it here? lugnet.cad.ldraw-tech? lugnet.cad.ldraw.tech? --Todd (22 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: mailing list linkage —Orion Pobursky
| | | | | (...) I think lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw.tech is long but it fits in with the existing scheme -Orion (22 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: mailing list linkage — Todd Lehman
| | | | | (...) Oh, that's a good point. Yes, it's a bit long, but as Steve points out, it's a relatively low-interest group. Putting it as .ldraw.tech instead of .ldraw-tech also makes it cleaner if other lists (such as, say, Tim's ldraw-siggraph list) (...) (22 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | | |
