 | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) Hi Tim, Give me a hollar if you would like a special group for this on LUGNET. If you have a list (either static or dynamic) of email addresses whom you want to grant posting access, it would be fairly easy for me to set things on LUGNET such (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) Great, thanks! Ultimately, the means of communication should be up to the elected LSC members to decide for themselves. If I had my say, I like the idea of a mailing list on LDraw.org, which posts messages automatically to a LUGNET group for (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | mailing list linkage
|
| (...) Aha -- yes, that would work too -- and is extremely easy to set up. In fact, if you wanted to make it read-only on LUGNET (so that the only way to post is via the mailing list on ldraw.org), all we need to do is subscribe an address (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: mailing list linkage
|
| (...) we can easily also tell mailman to post each email to the mailing list to a group on the NNTP server. Dan (22 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: mailing list linkage
|
| (...) Cool. Hmm, which to choose... It makes less work for me doing it the mailing list way, because of the incoming gateway translations at the e-mail level. What do we want to call it here? lugnet.cad.ldraw-tech? lugnet.cad.ldraw.tech? --Todd (22 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: mailing list linkage
|
| (...) I think lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw.tech is long but it fits in with the existing scheme -Orion (22 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) This sounds like a cool idea, but I don't think there's a need for it right now. The techies list is kinda low-interest -- it's good to have a public archive of the list (which we've already got), but I don't see a burning need to mirror it (...) (22 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: mailing list linkage
|
| (...) Oh, that's a good point. Yes, it's a bit long, but as Steve points out, it's a relatively low-interest group. Putting it as .ldraw.tech instead of .ldraw-tech also makes it cleaner if other lists (such as, say, Tim's ldraw-siggraph list) (...) (22 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) I think both LDraw.org and the community at large would benefit from it being mirrored. And another beauty of mirroring an archive like this is that it's so easy to set up that even if there's not a perceived burning need for it, the long-term (...) (22 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) Never mind... It sounds as though the LDraw-tech folks really don't want their list mirrored here. --Todd (22 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) What are you talking about Todd? I for one would like the list mirrored here. -Orion (22 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) Orion, Sorry for getting your hopes up. What I mean above is that I jumped the gun. Yesterday, I misunderstood Tim Courtney and Dan Boger in what they wrote here: (2 URLs) was proceeding under the general impression that it would occur, (...) (22 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
