To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 1366
1365  |  1367
Subject: 
Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Tue, 1 May 2001 21:22:33 GMT
Viewed: 
909 times
  
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message
news:p61uetc27fg7opir90ti5ea3skc73ec63o@4ax.com...

> I think Chris is right.  It will be challenging to disclaim an unofficial
> update in a way that nobody will get upset later.  When we do officialize
> the pieces, there will be orientation changes, and different part numbers
> with no forwarding addresses.  Models built on unofficial parts are likely
> to break.
> 
> There's also the issue of being able to later clean up the pollution from
> an unofficial update.  It would be easy to enough for people to use their
> Windows Find to locate files containing the word 'unofficial', and delete
> those files, but that would imply that we reviewed all the files before
> releasing them, to make sure they all have the "unofficial element" line.
> And reviewing all the files before an official release is something we're
> trying to avoid, right?

I think I see it now.  As far as broken models go, we don't want that.  I have
had a couple of those, and that's frustrating.

I got your message in this group about the news item, I'm working on that right
now.  I think it might be good to make an official statement about the parts on
the site as well - so what exactly will we do?

You wrote in another message:
> I think I can use my part-voting-preparation utilities to generate a
> webpage like the ones we use for voting.  So people could check out what
> the unofficial parts are, and either download them all in one shot, or just
> grab what they want.
> 
> Steve

Isn't this the same thing as releasing an unofficial update?  I know people want
parts, and something needs to be done.

I went back into the emails I have and read your latest message about the Parts
Tracker progress and Dan's comments you pasted.  You recently mentioned he is
busy - Dan (or Steve if you know), when do you think is a reasonable timeframe
to get a testable version up on the server?  When do you think is a reasonable
timeframe to get the official parts release out?

I think that we need to make a final decision about the parts update and
announce it - and assure the users that it is being worked on.  To me that means
in a separate thread, possibly to .announce, and posted on the site.

Tonight I'll keep churning on the SSI for the site, and throw together some news
to put up.

-Tim



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
 
(...) I think Chris is right. It will be challenging to disclaim an unofficial update in a way that nobody will get upset later. When we do officialize the pieces, there will be orientation changes, and different part numbers with no forwarding (...) (25 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

60 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR