To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 1325
1324  |  1326
Subject: 
Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:14:56 GMT
Viewed: 
40 times
  
"Chuck Sommerville" <chucks@he.net> wrote in message
news:GCMILA.AwH@lugnet.com...
In lugnet.cad.dev, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:

Okay, this is getting ridiculous.  We need a parts update.  There are, what,
hundreds?, of parts wasting in the pipeline.  How much longer are they going
to sit there?  How can holding the parts for this long be justified?


Perhaps we could break the job into smaller chunks, like maybe 20 parts a
week to relieve the pipeline pressure.

I've been pushing for this inside for quite some time, with little response.
Even splitting up the work for a big update among some of us who discuss
LDraw.org issues offline.

I'm still mixed, between the need for an update, and the understanding that this
is a volunteer project that no one gets paid for, though.

-Tim



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
 
(...) I'm not understanding here. The parts are available in file form in a some cluster in some repository somewhere, yes? Publishing them, even in an unofficial process, would simply consist of putting them on a server. There would be little-to-no (...) (24 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
  Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
 
"Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:GCMIxI.BvL@lugnet.com... (...) this (...) Just sent another email to a few people about this. I hope there'll be some progress. -Tim (24 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
 
(...) Perhaps we could break the job into smaller chunks, like maybe 20 parts a week to relieve the pipeline pressure. -Chuck (24 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

60 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR