 | | Sounds good, however... (from an LDRAW neophyte) —Pat Hough
|
| | | FORWARD: Please accept my comments in the civil spirit in which they were intended, and not an attempt to start some sort of conflict. I asked some very tough questions because the proposal seemed to advocate it. This is also a somewhat long (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Sounds good, however... (from an LDRAW neophyte) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) OK. Actually, there has been a good bit of discussion around these topics. But it would be a good idea to address them again. I'm going to snip/quote your message pretty heavily (and respond to things out of order). Y'all can assume that (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Sounds good, however... (from an LDRAW neophyte) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | Hi Pat - I will attempt to expound upon our ideas and answer your questions below. (revisit.... Steve beat me! Well, I'll take out what I feel Steve addressed well enough and add comments where I want to be a blabbermouth) ;-) "Pat Hough" (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Sounds good, however... (from an LDRAW neophyte) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | Tim and Steve answered a lot, I will try to fill in a few additional items and additional perspective. (...) While this is a laudable goal, it is not the first goal of the group. The first goal of the group is to solve some specific problems around (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Sounds good, however... (from an LDRAW neophyte) —Pat Mahoney
|
| | | | | On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 02:26:05AM +0000, Pat Hough wrote: First, I'd like to thank those who will be forming this group. The licenses are of course my biggest personal issue. So, thanks and good luck :) [snip] (...) Well, I am packaging leocad for (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Excellent Discussion, Well Met —Pat Hough
|
| | | | | | When I wrote the original reply to the proposal last Friday, I knew what I was letting myself in for and braced very hard this morning for the onslaught of Pandora's Box. However, after reading every followup in the thread, I must say that I am (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Excellent Discussion, Well Met —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) I have no official standing to delegate anything but if someone doesn't jump up and latch on to you I will be very surprised, as there are a number of areas within the site and elsewhere, where either word smithing, or worse, out and out (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Excellent Discussion, Well Met —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G8ALC8.CMF@lugnet.com... (...) Well put Lar. Pat - since you are experienced in technical writing, how would you like to help the site in the area of Reference and Get Started? We (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Let's Do It —Pat Hough
|
| | | | | | (...) Much appreciated -- it pays bills better than majoring in history would have. (...) I'm ready -- just tell me where to go to get started and a list of specific essays, opening paragraphs, descriptions you want. Since I am not an HTML expert I (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Sounds good, however... (from an LDRAW neophyte) —Geoff Gray
|
| | | | I think the idea of a formal organization is really good, provided that it does server it's constituants. I think this is a good start and I encourage you to continue. I agree on the problem of installing/getting all of the necessary tools running. (...) (24 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Sounds good, however... (from an LDRAW neophyte) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | (...) Serve or sever? I think that was a typo up there :) I honestly don't think a formal org will do either. It will be a way to bring together LCAD people in a more organized/official capacity, and the people involved in the government of the org (...) (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Sounds good, however... (from an LDRAW neophyte) —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | (...) I think that an installer program would be better, I for one dont like windows scripting host/vbscript, mostly because it has more security holes than a piece of swiss cheese :) (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
