|
|
 | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) What are you talking about Todd? I for one would like the list mirrored here. -Orion (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) Never mind... It sounds as though the LDraw-tech folks really don't want their list mirrored here. --Todd (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Status of LDDP open source release
|
| Hello! Some time ago I talked of creating an open source project for LDraw Design Pad , short LDDP. I created a project on sourceforge.net and uploaded the last release to the file system. (URL) know of some people they would be interested to bring (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) I think both LDraw.org and the community at large would benefit from it being mirrored. And another beauty of mirroring an archive like this is that it's so easy to set up that even if there's not a perceived burning need for it, the long-term (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: mailing list linkage
|
| (...) Oh, that's a good point. Yes, it's a bit long, but as Steve points out, it's a relatively low-interest group. Putting it as .ldraw.tech instead of .ldraw-tech also makes it cleaner if other lists (such as, say, Tim's ldraw-siggraph list) (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) This sounds like a cool idea, but I don't think there's a need for it right now. The techies list is kinda low-interest -- it's good to have a public archive of the list (which we've already got), but I don't see a burning need to mirror it (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: mailing list linkage
|
| (...) I think lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw.tech is long but it fits in with the existing scheme -Orion (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: mailing list linkage
|
| (...) Cool. Hmm, which to choose... It makes less work for me doing it the mailing list way, because of the incoming gateway translations at the e-mail level. What do we want to call it here? lugnet.cad.ldraw-tech? lugnet.cad.ldraw.tech? --Todd (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: mailing list linkage
|
| (...) we can easily also tell mailman to post each email to the mailing list to a group on the NNTP server. Dan (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) I would rephrase that... under the most prevalent current limitation scheme being floated, (LSC eligible==LSC voting eligible) you would not be able to, and I would barely squeak by. Certainly other schemes could be floated, with different (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
