|
|
 | | Re: Still no zip file for 2008-01?
|
| (...) On further investigation, it is now clear why I did this. All three files are obsolete and not used by any official parts and as primitives/subparts should not be directly referenced in models. Because this update was a complete library (...) (17 years ago, 28-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Still no zip file for 2008-01?
|
| (...) On further investigation, it is now clear why I did this. All three files are obsolete and not used by any official parts and as primitives/subparts should not be directly referenced in models. Because this update was a complete library (...) (17 years ago, 27-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Still no zip file for 2008-01?
|
| (...) Thanks for pointing this out. I don't understand how those files got to become zero-length, but these will be restored in the next parts update (which is under development at present). Chris Dee (LDraw Parts Library Admin) (17 years ago, 27-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Printing LPub instructions with Lulu.com
|
| (...) Yes, the binding is stapled. Lulu offers a few differing binding options (stapled, plastic coil, paperback-like "perfect" binding, etc.), but stapled is the only option available for a minimal number of pages (22, in this case). I was worried (...) (17 years ago, 13-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.mac, lugnet.inst, lugnet.publish, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Printing LPub instructions with Lulu.com
|
| (...) Very cool--I love it! To be honest, it would never have occurred to me to use Lulu; I got as far as "I should try Kinkos," and that's where I sort of stalled. I have to say that the end results look amazingly professional and high-quality. (...) (17 years ago, 13-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.mac, lugnet.inst, lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
|
