 | | Updating other persons parts?
|
|
What is the official stance on updating parts done by other people? I did some modifications to part 2485 on the tracker and have tried to send it to the orignal author, but am not sure wether he got it or not. (24 years ago, 7-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Hidden male connectors (studs)
|
|
Hello LCD "community", As female connectors (mainly stud inlets) can effectively hide male connectors (mainly studs), we should ensure that the LCD project do not waste such an opportunity to further speed up LDraw display. I think this possibility (...) (24 years ago, 6-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re: What is the state of LMPL proposal?
|
|
(...) KACS is working, as I know, but he has other tasks too. We must be patient; he is often slow, but the result worths the time. (Damien, would you be so kind to forward this mail to the group? It needs a lot of work to respond on the website (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | What is the state of LMPL proposal?
|
|
Is it deferred or still coming soon? Damien (24 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | I hold ALM until LMPL publication
|
|
Hi Kiss Attila Csongor, Hi Láng Attila D, Now I stop talking about LCD or LMPL, until publication. Before publication I can not evaluate if my own approach has any "added value". Termolo is a general purpose language with simplistic syntax. Before (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | I hold ALM, at least until LMPL publication
|
|
Hi Kiss Attila Csongor, Hi Láng Attila D, Now I stop talking about LCD or LMPL, until publication. Before publication I can not evaluate if my own approach has any "added value". Termolo is a general purpose language with simplistic syntax. Before (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re: Will LMPL be Simulation-approach or Usage-approach ?
|
|
DG> Do not forget to download Spiderbot.dat (in lugnet.cad.models) It came automatically via e-mail. :) DG> We embody two different well-known approaches. Both of LCD and LMPL embody these two approaches. DG> First : the Simulation approach. DG> And (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re[4]: I have read the article about LCD
|
|
Hi Damien! DG> Now you speak about layers. DG> That is precisely what I called "multiple syntax levels". DG> Software layers are known to be very bad for software engineering and design DG> in general. I don't think so. What about object oriented (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Will LMPL be Simulation-approach or Usage-approach ?
|
|
Hi Láng Attila D. Hi Kiss Attila Csongor, Do not forget to download Spiderbot.dat (in lugnet.cad.models) The debate becomes VERY interesting. We embody two different well-known approaches. First : the Simulation approach. Things are nothing but (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re: Re[2]: I have read the article about LCD
|
|
(...) Hello Láng Attila D. Hello Kiss Attila Csongor, Now you speak about layers. That is precisely what I called "multiple syntax levels". Software layers are known to be very bad for software engineering and design in general. On the contrary, ALM (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
