|
 | | Re: [PARTS] - Header keyword line
|
| (...) I'll try. I haven't looked through my L-CAD archive so the answers will be slightly vague. (...) None that I know of, but I expect it to be added to the parts searcher soon. (...) I think CATEGORY was intended for things that belonged in (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) You can't. Even with a part in hand you can't because how do you know every part thru the ages is the same. A case in point, I just did an inventory of all the parts I have and found two 45 1 x 2 slopes that (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with LDAO, L3PAO
|
| (...) If you are using LDAO 1.4..5 try this: Make a backup copy of your ldraw.ini file in /windows. Then open the primary ldraw.ini file and find the [Categories] section. Delete all entries in that section. Save the file and try running Make (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: parts wanted
|
| (...) Yes, I'm working on those. But work progress is slow. I have drafts for 2852 Technic Connecting Rod 2853 Technic Crankshaft 2854 Technic Crankshaft Centre at the website (URL) planning to finish off these by some time, but don't hold your (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
|
| (...) What if they slip past Terry, not being noted as "mockups" and it takes someone a long time to notices that they're incorrect? (...) Does that imply that carelessness and LDRAW do mix? (...) Precision/decimal accuracy are one thing -- that's (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: Quality of authored parts
|
| (...) I'm certainly not offended. OTOH, I'm going to keep with the standard LDraw simplifications, at least to the extent of not including the dimples beneath the studs on plates and bricks. Steve (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Charter for newsgroup for ldraw.org
|
| (...) How does this sound?-- Focused discussion group for ldraw.org: planning, site architecture, legal issues, contributions, maintenance, software distribution methods and formats, feedback, etc. And a quick opinion poll -- a or b: a) (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Status/Help Needed
|
| (...) Actually I'm not a user of LDRAW or other Lego CADS (at present moment), but rather a Mindstorm/robotics maniac. Anyway, I understand you CAD guys are doing a great job and I admire your perseverance and your results too. You didn't mention (...) (25 years ago, 22-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| Terry K wrote in message <36d4f44c.3127860@lu...et.com>... (...) about is (...) have (...) by (...) you (...) This is certainly true, but with some research dimensions can be determined by comparison with known parts via this very discussion and (...) (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: Modeling without the real element -- bad
|
| I'm quite happy to have pieces be mockups. If it is recognizable, it does the job of recording and communicating the model. IMO, perfection an LDRAW do not mix. Two decimal points? Rounding errors? 16 colors with _dithering_? Type 5 lines that may (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | [ldraw.org] TLG Models
|
| I would like to suggest that we keep the discussion of the TLG Model Repository to lugnet.cad.dev. It is simpler to keep the discussion of the ldraw.org site in one place. Todd, do you feel its appropriate to create a new (temporary) newsgroup for (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: Ldraw.org: Organization and look & feel
|
| (...) any (...) mouse (...) list (and (...) sit (...) lists (or (...) WOW! I guess that means I have to stop "cheating" in my DAT files (ie, mirroring a wing or other left/right piece instead of using the correct piece) (...) core (...) amount of (...) (25 years ago, 9-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: Ldraw.org: Organization and look & feel
|
| (...) Good. I have absolutely no problem with using an existing database residing on lugnet.com instead of creating one from scratch. Its a good way to avoid redundancy, avoid redundancy. :) (...) exactly (...) Great! Could we make the upload (...) (25 years ago, 9-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | ldraw part update?
|
| i remember seeing the voting last month.. is there an approximate date when the new parts will come out? ..joseph g (26 years ago, 23-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
