|
 | | Re: [ldraw.org] Domain Registration
|
| (...) But no one else is going to snap up all of your supplier's paper from under your nose if you don't act immediately. And you're probably ordering a bit ahead, so that a delay in delivery of future supplies doesn't affect your ability to (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 1.001)
|
|
| | Noting gaps in parts sequences
|
| I just noticed that the oilcan is missing from the 6246 group: (URL) this because it hasn't been modeled yet (maybe due to its complexity?) or is it just located elsewhere for some historical reason? Anyway, presumably it would go in as 6246F when (...) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.001)
|
|
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| (...) !! Really? How do you expect to be able to accurately model pieces into LDraw if you don't have them? I can understand maybe real simple pieces, but some of the pieces you have attempted have been of complex forms. I find it difficult to (...) (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.001)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) agreed again... my point being that TLG *may* use different element numbers to differentiate between certain parts in different colors (perhaps not 1x2 bricks) but that our concern should only be separate part numbers when the physical makeup (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.001)
|
|
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) Old version tiles didn't have these grooves and LDraw, to my knowledge, doesn't model it because of precision. Case in point ... (...) <FLAME><FLAME THROWER><AIR SUPPORT><ICBM> Nuff said Roy (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.001)
|
|
| | [ldraw.org] Shockwave Flash
|
| Ben Vaughan & all: I am interested in making a Shockwave Flash version of ldraw.org to give it a little spice. Ben, you use shockwave on your marsbase site, and I am confused on how to create things in shockwave. I have visited Macromedia's website (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.001)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) I vote in favour of solution #1 By the way, The pink Belville dinghy exists, it was part of set #5841 As seen from the pictures in my Dutch 1988 catalogue, it's identical to the yellow dinghy . Greetings, M. Moolhuysen. (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.001)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.001)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) I wonder -- are there color-specific part numbers for the dinghy, because it is a compound element? So if we publish two sub-files, and no shortcut, we skip the whole issue. But not publishing a shortcut seems really lame. The "part" is final (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.001)
|
|
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
| Benoit: (...) I have always believed that Japan uses a year-month-day date format. Are you sure? Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- LDraw FAQ: <URL:(URL) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.001)
|
|
| | Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
|
| I totally agree, we should find a public or freeware CAD program to do the mundane for us in modeling. I also agree that finding something we can all agree on would be monumental task. I would love to be able to use MAX output ( as I've previous (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.001)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) ...I might disagree with that point... (...) And on then at 05:14:29 GMT, Joshua Delahunty <dulcaoin@alumni.cse.ucsc.edu> wrote: (...) :-P, yourself. (...) Wow. Blows my theory. Do we know if, in these examples, the numbers are color-specific? (...) (26 years ago, 10-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.001)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw/CAD links
|
| (...) Oh yes, definitely. Is this (below) the best URL then, since the distributions are given as .ZIP files linked to from that page--? (URL) listed as "MPD Builder" in the links list but lemme know if it should be listed with a different name, or (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.001)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) I do. The parts I use the most (Technic axles, cross blocks, bushings, pins and so on), I also remember the number for. But I'm helpless without a list which can be used to look up the ones I can't remember, obviously. Fredrik (26 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.001)
|
|
| | Re: Foundations (Was: [ldraw.org] Eve of Beginnings)
|
| (...) Ohh...wait :) I was going to keep 'The LDraw Foundation' capatilzed that way, yes. Oops :) Um, my comment on that was if the site was called ldraw.org, it would be either all uppercase or all lowercase. Sorry about the confusion. (...) Hmmm... (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.001)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) Yes, I use it often. It's Extremely Wonderful. (...) That would be great. I'm planning on adding support for KEYWORDS and CATEGORY to LDAO, but haven't had the time yet... Steve (26 years ago, 10-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| Karim (knassar@mindspring.com) wrote: [...] (...) I am aware of the problems with using a different number for the part file than the one (visibly) stamped on the part, but I think it would be sufficient if a comment in the dinghy bottom (and top) (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <36ee613a.2319642@lu...et.com>... (...) ACAD comes in several flavors. The industrial strength ACAD is a monster, but it can handle just about anything you can think of in a CAD. For those who may not need all the bells (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: patents
|
| (...) 1) TLG knows about LDraw. 2) One or more LEGO employees read this newsgroup/mailing list. Steve (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| Terry K (legoverse@geocities.com) comments Karim's "30086.dat" and "30087.dat" in colour 16, and "4106548.dat" in yellow/yellow suggestion (which I support): (...) Yes. The problem is that this is a multi-mold part which is likely to appear in (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.000)
|
