Subject:
|
Re: In dev: new ldconfig.ldr file
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:09:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2894 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Kyle McDonald wrote:
> Also it's occurred to me since my last post on the
> internationization topic, that the Color names, and color
> definitions might be better off split up.
Yes ... and no.
If we did produce a fully internationalized, multi-namable color definition set,
we'd almost certainly include a 'default name' property for the colors.
So think of the data in ldconfig.ldr as the color definitions + the default
names.
If anyone wants to work on a definition of a language file, with info like...
ldlang-en.ldr:
0 COLOURNAME 0 Black
(I'm mono-lingual, so this is as far as the example is going to go)
... that would be cool.
But I feel fairly strongly that international color-name-lists really belong in
the upcoming color database, not in the LDraw distribution.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: In dev: new ldconfig.ldr file
|
| (...) That sounds sensible. Also it's occurred to me since my last post on the internationization topic, that the Color names, and color definitions might be better off split up. 1. If the skins or theme's catch on, there's no sense having a (...) (20 years ago, 9-Aug-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
