Subject:
|
Re: Primitive Generator program update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Jun 2004 05:48:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1505 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Paul Easter wrote:
> > I can do that. Now why didn't I know that CCW was the standard winding?
> > Maybe the 2x4 didn't hit hard enough? ;)
>
> Just for the record, this is set out in the BFC standard,
> <http://www.ldraw.org/article/217>. In the section "Parts Library Guidelines",
> it is stated:
>
> > It is desirable for all files to use the same winding. When possible,
> > files should use counter-clockwise winding. The actual winding for any
> > part is left to the file author. Primitives should always use CCW
> > winding.
ok.
>
> Interesting side note: this section also says:
> > New parts will not be required to be compliant with this extension.
> > They will be required to carry a 0 BFC tag, indicating either
> > compliance or non-compliance.
>
> Which means we should be slapping 0 BFC NOCERTIFY tags on all non-BFC parts
> before they are released...
Might need to job parts reviewers memories to this detail. (maybe this post
will)
>
> Steve
I have uploaded the update to the webpage;
http://www.geocities.com/pneaster/prim-gen.htm
Let me know if that is any better, and if I caused any other bugs. I did not
spend much time testing.
Paul
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Primitive Generator program update
|
| (...) Just for the record, this is set out in the BFC standard, (URL). In the section "Parts Library Guidelines", it is stated: (...) Interesting side note: this section also says: (...) Which means we should be slapping 0 BFC NOCERTIFY tags on all (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
