Subject:
|
Re: LDRAWPREDIRS LDRAWPOSTDIRS - Summary please!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:40:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4162 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Michael Lachmann wrote:
> "Don Heyse" schrieb:
> > If we're going to use the <LDRAWDIR>\folder syntax with the
> > slash, should we restrict it to the DOS style since we already
> > must deal with that inside the official parts files with the
> > parts\s and p\48 subdirectories. Just a thought...
>
> No I don't think so, there will be no old programm reading this file, or the
> section in it. I think there are no real dos applications created now, or?
> Even if you create command line applications now, they will be able to work
> with long file names.
Actually I wasn't thinking about long filenames, just the slashes.
I can never remember which one is called backslash so I probably
wasn't all that clear. Maybe we should just *recommend* using the
DOS style slashes as the directory separator, especially for any
directories that start with <LDRAWDIR> because we know from the
part files that all programs (new or old) must be able to handle
the DOS \ path separator character.
> > And I'm curious about the <> characters in filenames. I tried to make
> > some under Win2K and on a linux EXT2 filesystem and failed. Ok, that's
> > not a really extensive filesystem test, but do you remember where you
> > saw them?
>
> I must say I didn't try that after windows nt 3.51 which did allow that,
> when you created a file at least. I will have a test on that.
I wouldn't bother. I bet there are plenty of filesystems where you
can create really weird filenames as long as you use a program instead
of the command line to do it. Once someone mentioned doing it that
way with DOS I remembered running into both UNIX and DOS filenames that
I had to build special programs to work with.
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LDRAWPREDIRS LDRAWPOSTDIRS - Summary please!
|
| (...) Well, I still compile a 16-bit DOS version of L3P for a few users (2%), but I think the coming version 1.4 will be the last. The possibilities when having the full tree in memory are too tempting. We can recommend the few hardcore DOS users to (...) (21 years ago, 15-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDRAWPREDIRS LDRAWPOSTDIRS - Summary please!
|
| "Don Heyse" <dheyse@hotmail.spam....away.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HuLIG9.210E@lugnet.com... <SNIP> (...) Yes, I prefere that too. (...) No I don't think so, there will be no old programm reading this file, or the section in it. I think there (...) (21 years ago, 15-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
132 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
