Subject:
|
Re: Primitive tolerances
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:46:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1350 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Paul Easter wrote:
> Can someone tell me what kind of accuracy tolerances we should be working within
> when it comes to scalable primitives?
>
> http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=p/48/4-4ring3.dat
>
> I have placed a hold vote on this ring. Most all the numbers are within .0002.
> Is that acceptable or should the numbers be corrected. Can someone else give
> this part a close look over?
My understanding was that primitives should have 4 decimal places of accuracy.
However, whether or not this is the case, I think that any decimal places that
are included should be accurate including appropriate rounding.
Just my 2 cents.
--Travis Cobbs
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Primitive tolerances
|
| Can someone tell me what kind of accuracy tolerances we should be working within when it comes to scalable primitives? (URL) have placed a hold vote on this ring. Most all the numbers are within .0002. Is that acceptable or should the numbers be (...) (21 years ago, 19-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
