Subject:
|
Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 04:56:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2227 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Paul Gyugyi wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes:
> > > About the only thing ldraw.org could[1] do is to start an 'LDraw.org
> > Compatible' program, where various programs could label themselves as LDraw
> > compliant, if they follow the standards.[2] But that sounds too
> > Mickey-Mouse to be worth doing, IMO.
> But, isn't that more-or-less exactly what happens with the parts library?
Not really. The important thing with the parts library is that files are
accepted and added the distribution file. We don't even have a '0
Official' any more - now it's '0 LDRAW_ORG'.
I was envisioning the 'LDraw.org Compatible' program to be a set of
verbiage and site icon images, identifying a program as following the
standards laid out by LDraw.org. 'Mickey Mouse' was probably a harsh label
to use; I meant that such a program wouldn't be worth doing if our main
intent was to get developers to produce LDraw-compatible programs.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
