Subject:
|
Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 16 Mar 2003 16:56:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2270 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Dan Boger writes:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 04:08:51PM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > > Advance users that edit the files manually already have
> > > to understand the file format, with everything that goes with it.
> >
> > Sure, understood. I still like the idea of a more common character; even
> > encapsulating (META) in parenthasees is more common.
>
> sure, that works almost as well as {}. It's the _lack_ of any
> punctuation that bothered me there.
Cool.
Although I don't have that much (if any) of a say in punctuation/no
punctuation, I could go either way. I still prefer no punctuation, to keep
it consistent with the way it's been done before. BUT - can't always get
hung up on the past :-)
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
