CAD Development : 8139


CAD / Development / 8139

		Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives) —Dan Boger
		(...) I'd have to look at the code again, but there's no reason why it couldn't deal with anything :) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

				Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives) —Steve Bliss
				(...) True, but it'd probably be better to restrict ourselves to a limited set of characters that are well-supported in file and path names on different OS's and protocols. But you already knew that, right? ;) Steve (22 years ago, 11-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

				Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives) —Chris Dee
				(...) In another branch of this thread it was my understanding that we had agreement on renaming box3#8p.dat to box3u8p.dat. Chris (22 years ago, 11-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)