Subject:
|
Re: question/problem with some flag parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 12 Dec 2002 17:45:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
366 times
|
| |
|
|
You're right. The 43.dat isn't a 6 x 4 flag. But I can't tell you
if there exists a real 6 x 3 1/3 one. The "Jolly Roger" one is
named correct.
Does anybody want to fix this?
CU Bernd
Jaco van der Molen <jmolen@globalxs.nl> schrieb im
Newsbeitrag news:H708w9.D9u@lugnet.com...
> Hmm...
> The flag 6 x 4 (#43) is actually 6 x 3 1/3.
> Flag 6 x 4 (#43P01) is 6 x 4.
>
> Strange. I do not own any of these two parts, but I think
> part 43 is either mesured wrong or the description is
> wrong. Or part 43P01 is wrong...
>
> Jaco
>
> "Jonathan Wilson" <jonwil@tpgi.com.au> schreef in bericht
> news:H706nH.93G@lugnet.com...
> > Can someone explain why the "flag 6 x 4" and the "flat
> > 6 x 4 with jolly roger pattern" are different sizes? Is
> > this an error?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: question/problem with some flag parts
|
| (...) I'm pretty sure there is not a 6 x 3 1/3 flag, and seeing as the original author titled it "6 x 4" I suspect this was just an error in authoring (and review !). I'll liaise with the author to arrange a fix. Chris (22 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: question/problem with some flag parts
|
| Hmm... The flag 6 x 4 (#43) is actually 6 x 3 1/3. Flag 6 x 4 (#43P01) is 6 x 4. Strange. I do not own any of these two parts, but I think part 43 is either mesured wrong or the description is wrong. Or part 43P01 is wrong... Jaco "Jonathan Wilson" (...) (22 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
