Subject:
|
Re: Question about part 6233
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 05:55:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
710 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> I was looking at part 6233 tonight and noticed a number of primitives that
> are inlined. I restored the part to the non-inlined state and did not
> notice any change in the part. As there is not one listed in the part
> header, is there a reason for the primitives to be inlined? This part was
> authored by Steve.
I seem to remember that I wrote those primitive files for that part,
then I didn't want to go through the headache of getting the primitives
approved. Or maybe I thought they wouldn't be very useful primitives.
So they were probably inlined as a matter of authoring convenience.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Question about part 6233
|
| I was looking at part 6233 tonight and noticed a number of primitives that are inlined. I restored the part to the non-inlined state and did not notice any change in the part. As there is not one listed in the part header, is there a reason for the (...) (22 years ago, 18-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
