Subject:
|
Re: Part recycling question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 12:06:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
423 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky writes:
> One quick question:
> Say a new part is authored that uses a portion of an older, flawed part. Is
> it the part author's responsibility to fix the flaws in the underlying DAT
> code? I think this would mostly apply to the creation of patterned parts
>
> -Orion
I think in the first instance you should attempt to contact the author of
the original (flawed) part, or if not known raise it for discussion here.
Regardless of the re-use issue, we should be attempting to fix serious flaws.
In general we should avoid re-using code in patterned parts, but rather
create a subfile containing all the common non-patterned regions of the
part. This has maintenance implications if there are already several
patterned versions in the official releases.
To which part do you refer?
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Part recycling question
|
| (...) Part 2598. I'm modelling the windscreen from the UCS TIE Interceptor and am having a heck of a time trying to fix the underlying DAT code. I have seriouly considered completely remodeling the whole part, the only thing stopping me is old part (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Part recycling question
|
| One quick question: Say a new part is authored that uses a portion of an older, flawed part. Is it the part author's responsibility to fix the flaws in the underlying DAT code? I think this would mostly apply to the creation of patterned parts (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
