Subject:
|
Re: Technic Link vs Technic Rod
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Aug 2001 20:00:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
786 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:03:47 GMT, Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote:
> The name of part 2637 "Technic Link 16L" is a bit problematic, because
> it interferes with the 3711 "Technic Link Chain" and 3873 "Technic
> Link Tread".
>
> Would it make sense to rename 2637 to "Technic Rod 16L"? That way, it
> would appear in it's own sub category, rather than sitting with the
> chain links. At the same time, the 2739 "Technic Steering Link" could
> be renamed "Technic Rod 6L Steering", for example.
>
> What do you think? Would this create more clearity in the library?
I agree. Also the newly created part 32293 should be renamed "Technic Rod 9 L"
Marc Klein
A Mindstorms fan.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Technic Link vs Technic Rod
|
| The name of part 2637 "Technic Link 16L" is a bit problematic, because it interferes with the 3711 "Technic Link Chain" and 3873 "Technic Link Tread". Would it make sense to rename 2637 to "Technic Rod 16L"? That way, it would appear in it's own sub (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
