|
|
 | | BFC revisited
|
| I'm looking for a model file that utilizes BFC-certified parts to test backface culling in the CAD application I'm developing. Unfortunately, as near as I can tell, only 13 part files have a BFC-related comment, and on top of that, they're not (...) (23 years ago, 16-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Datsville Overview Map (Was: Boundary Box Utility)
|
| Here is another idea for optimizing dat models. It isn't a very good one, but, it just seems more realistic than what I said earlier (writing a utility smart enough to optimize an entire model). One could write a utility that presents each polygon (...) (23 years ago, 16-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: LDGLite bug report (yes, one more)
|
| Don: (...) Definitely. (...) Yup. :-( Jacob (23 years ago, 16-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Datsville Overview Map (Was: Boundary Box Utility)
|
| You could specify (or firmly recommend) in the future that models must posses boundary boxes measured in degrees of tilewidths (or half-tilewidth's). Anything less than that would be considered a prop. Props would then be dealt with seperately, just (...) (23 years ago, 16-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Datsville Overview Map (Was: Boundary Box Utility)
|
| Of course, the same could be accomplished in LDraw. Mike (...) (23 years ago, 16-Aug-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
