Subject:
|
Re: Vote 99-02: Page 3900
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Mar 1999 07:51:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
592 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 13:30:15 GMT, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) wrote:
> I was looking at this part some more, and wondering: are there two
> different versions of this piece, are does this part-file contain some
> serious design errors?
>
> All the RL examples of this element in my possession have a technic-stud
> on one side and a flat back. The 3900.dat file shows a technic-stud on
> the front, a tube on the back, and a hole (looks like radius=4) through
> the studs.
>
> Steve
Good point. All I have is ones as you described it - no holes/one stud.
Somebody speak up on this so we can get it straightened out.
Until I get a good answer, this part is on hold.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Vote 99-02: Page 3900
|
| I was looking at this part some more, and wondering: are there two different versions of this piece, are does this part-file contain some serious design errors? All the RL examples of this element in my possession have a technic-stud on one side and (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
