|
|
 | | Re: Gappy Spheroids?
|
| I forgot to mention. If you are examining a piece, it is usually much easier to determine surface characteristics (or flaws) if it is opaque. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@san.REMOVE.rr.com) (24 years ago, 6-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Gappy Spheroids?
|
| "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message news:G0HFCH.Dz9@lugnet.com... (...) L3Lab, (...) an (...) occuring (...) it's (...) the (...) of a (...) You're right; it's hard to see. In fact, I can't see it at all, but I'll take your word for (...) (24 years ago, 6-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: 6216.dat (mock-up) - "brick 2x4x2 rounded triple"???
|
| (...) D'OH!!! But I *checked* -- uhh, waitaminit... I checked for "30237", the *other* mock-up I did, I *forgot* to check for "6216". :-P Tore, I'm sorry. :-( "Mea culpa." Thanks, Franklin (24 years ago, 6-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: 6216.dat (mock-up) - "brick 2x4x2 rounded triple"???
|
| (...) When Tore submitted this part for release, he called it "Brick 2 x 4 x 2 Curved". Steve (24 years ago, 6-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Gappy Spheroids?
|
| (...) I suppose I could have been more specific in my explanation. The gaps aren't occuring between my approximate curve and a primitive; they're occuring at the joints between facets of the approximate curve. An example of the faceting can be seen (...) (24 years ago, 6-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
