 | | Re: Category Statement —Steve Bliss
|
| | | In lugnet.cad.dev, Manfred Moolhuysen wrote: Moving this one to the top: (...) CATEGORY provides a method to place all parts in a comprehensive classification system. KEYWORDS provides a method to associate potential search-terms with a part. (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Category Statement —Manfred Moolhuysen
|
| | | | (...) By all means! I was secretly hoping that my questions would lead to such a type of action. Feel free to rearange them into a clear set of instructions. You've earned my gratitude again, M. Moolhuysen. (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Category Statement —Michael Lachmann
|
| | | | | But this also tells me that I will wait before implementing anything regarding this topic! Michael Manfred Moolhuysen <moom@nospamchello.nl> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag: FxJL77.4oo@lugnet.com... (...) basis (...) instructions. (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Category Statement —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | OK, I've taken the Q&A that was posted awhile ago, and put it into an html file. Before placing it on ldraw.org, I'd like to hear any suggestions for improvement people might have (for one thing, I think it's too wordy). Anyway, I've tossed the page (...) (24 years ago, 1-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Category Statement —Rui Manuel Silva Martins
|
| | | | (...) First, good work ! I would replace the following : (...) BY: Q: What is the syntax for these two meta-statements? 0 CATEGORY <category name> 0 KEYWORDS <word1>, <word2>, ... , <wordN> For Now that's all See ya Rui Martins (24 years ago, 2-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Category Statement —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Thanks. It's all to Manfred's credit -- he put out the list of questions that needed to be addressed. (...) Doh! OK, I'll fix this. Steve (24 years ago, 2-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
