 | | Re: BFC: LITS 2 —Rui Manuel Silva Martins
| | | | I read the current proposal, and I have this to say: I don't agree with the following paragraph when an entire branch has to have cliping on to be able to be culled, don't think so. ( I know about the invert case, solution required ) 4 Control of (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: BFC: LITS 2 —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) Unless we have a solution to the invert case, the document's assertion is correct. (...) I think you are correct that NOWIND/UNKNOWN is not important/needed. For now, let's proceed assuming that decorations will be handled by using NOCLIP or (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | |
