 | | Re: New minifig-scale anthromorphic lifter/loader —Tore Eriksson
|
| | | (...) First step is to make a list of parts to redo. Then we need to know if the lines are about one LDU thick. Then I can volunteer on some parts - and hopefully some more? /Tore (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New minifig-scale anthromorphic lifter/loader —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | (...) Don't forget to put the car wash brush on that list. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New minifig-scale anthromorphic lifter/loader —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) --Todd (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New minifig-scale anthromorphic lifter/loader —Tore Eriksson
|
| | | | | | No, definitely not! IMO, Jonathan responded totally on-topic to my message, (with capitals and apostrophes perfectly in place). He pointed out that not only some printed patterns, but also the 2473 car wash brush contains "2 24..." lines that l3p (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New minifig-scale anthromorphic lifter/loader —Chris Dee
|
| | | | (...) Please beware that there are genuine reasons for having lines in patterns so long as they are hidden within polygons - so don't assume that any patterned part with a type 2 line is in error. This technique helps to prevent the pattern (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
