Subject:
|
Re: DAT voting page up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 19:02:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1898 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999 10:09:23 GMT, "Lars C. Hassing" <lch@ccieurope.com>
wrote:
> Steve Bliss wrote:
> > > The point here would be that line drawings would not be accurate
> > > since the part numbers I've seen are raised and moulded as are
> > > the lot numbers and some even have copyrights moulded.
> >
> > It's not *that* hard to go from the line drawings to raised forms.
> > Especially since each numeral only needs to be done once.
>
> I'm glad you think so, beacuse I was going to suggest that to you,
> when you made the coins ;-)
No winky needed. It's a very valid point.
I definitely thought about making the lettering raised for the coins.
Then again, I was also thinking to myself "why am I wasting time on
these useless, decoration-only parts when I could be doing some useful
Technic bits?" Which is probably why I didn't go to full distance of
doing proper raised lettering.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RE: DAT voting page up
|
| (...) I'm glad you think so, beacuse I was going to suggest that to you, when you made the coins ;-) (...) You can have a hint of how to model the numerals by looking at L3P's primitive substitute for stud.dat (in any L3P generated POV file). /Lars (28 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
