 | | Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Speaking of which... I just posted my wants list. I want hundreds of most of the items on it. Someone pointed out to me that if I could tell of sets that had large quantities of the parts I might get better responses. Given the current state (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | I haven't gotten any nibbles, can someone suggest a group better suited to answering this question? (...) <for one part> (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) lugnet.general? lugnet.helpwanted? The current problem is that there aren't that many published inventories for current sets. So you need to hook up to someone who is A-R enough to inventory everything themselves,. Steve (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Todd and Joshua D. have an amazing number inventoried, between them. At least that's my suspicion. It's convincing them to make the data available in a format I can run reverse queries against that is the hard part. (25 years ago, 4-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET —Joshua Delahunty
|
| | | | (...) I'm not sure I want to do them all (though the list was much shorter than I thought it would be), but here's a start, the very first on the list. Here are the sets (that I know of) released since 1992, with black 1x1 bricks, sorted reverse on (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| | | | |
