 | | Re: CW/CCW, vertex sequence, co-planar, convex, (115kB) —Steve Bliss
| | | | (...) That would be nice, but it's unrealistic. (...) No, they shouldn't. Just because the part XYZ is CW, a program can't assume that the primitive ABC is also CW. (...) I like this. I don't like it for use on primitives, but DOUBLE-SIDED could (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: CW/CCW, vertex sequence, co-planar, convex, (115kB) —Jacob Sparre Andersen
| | | | | [ I got a bit too much good French red wine, so maybe I shouldn't try to answer now, but ... ] Steve: (...) Right. (...) Shouldn't all elements of transparent parts be drawn? (...) Yes. (I start to suspect that wine has a good influence on my (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | |
